Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Does My Terrier Have A Goitre?

CHLOE or Amanda Syfried Gone Wild





There are healthy and unhealthy obsessions. I have experienced both, and after a long time I decided to stay with the former.




few months ago I had a little debate about the word obsession. I clarified that it was my favorite word and that was exactly my obsession more films, among others not worth mentioning at this time. Someone struggling with some vehemence that did bother me that these obsessions always came with a negative tinge. Neither was able to win.

I think the sexual thriller genre when he "Chloe" had already presented everything I had to do. Someone obsessed with another, everything goes well at first, then everything gets worse and not the end.


While this film shows some innovative story lines as the next lesbian obsessive, can not entirely convincing. And it would confirm that one of the elements not to work is the main character, Amanda Syfried. Despite a management style that focuses Atom Egoyan deep into the erotic, Syfried not seem to get to the point necessary to be considered "bad" of the film.


I had encouraged since I had seen his side convincingly, soft and tender in "Letters to Juliet, but occur alongside large as Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson, can be a demanding challenge that is difficult to succeed. Not even all the nudity that was in this role could save her.

now have to see how necessary are the explicit sex scenes for this thriller. Could it be that Egoyan was not confident enough in the talent of its lead actress who made her undress for most of the film?


is true that for lovers of pure eroticism climax it will be a celebration of the senses where the play of a trio of characters as possible (Syfried, Neeson and Moore) that oozes sexuality to the surface will be bowled over by one. Egoyan makes it to this level with great delicacy. Despite this point in his favor, the script lapses into repeating himself invariably between appointments in the cafe, restaurant, offering nothing beyond what had not been seen before, in addition to lesbian scenes and a strong point Drawing cash, it should be clarified.


extracted Synopsis: Catherine (Julianne Moore), a successful gynecologist who leads a comfortable life, but monotonous, with her husband David (Liam Neeson) and his son Michael (Max Thieriot), begins to suspect that David is cheating. Having casually Chloe (Amanda Seyfried), a beautiful young prostitute estate, hire decides to seduce her husband and to test their loyalty. But the accounts of meetings with David Chloe not only catch on Catherine the wick of jealousy, but also a series of hidden desires that the puzzle. Caught in a web of passions and feelings, Catherine will discover that the dangerous game of seduction Chloe whole family is involved.


A Neeson, almost absent, and Moore repeating abstracted female roles and deceived, they failed to meet my expectations for this film despite its high sex claims.

scene not to miss: The pivot point.

My recommendation: Because of its high sexual explicit content minors lead. Rent it in the comfort of your home.

0 comments:

Post a Comment